Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
by Tony Smith
at 2010-11-14 15:06:42
(Forum::Public::Wind)
Our local Environmental Health don't work off those colour coded distance charts. And just as well, as they would be way over what I consider acceptable noise limits.
Locally they look for either less than 35dB(A) at 10m/s (the "simplified assessment"), or to allow a bit more slack they assess the predicted noise against an assumed background noise. To do this all they need is the source noise which is given in that document.
If the machine's not MCS approved then that a different matter, and rules it out in any case.
--
aesmith
Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 24/09 |
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 25/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 26/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 26/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 27/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
blo - 1/10 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 2/10 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 21/10 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 7/11 |
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 11/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 11/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 14/11 |
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 14/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Jonathan Hirst - 1/12 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 12/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter Griffiths - 24/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 29/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 29/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Cris Gavin - 14/12 |
If you'd like to post comments on this site, just 