Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
by Tony Smith
at 2010-09-26 10:12:06
(Forum::Public::Wind)
I spoke to Environmental Health at length on Friday. The issue is this "Noise Label" that Proven have now published in their Accoustic Performance document.
Based on those figures Environmental Health are specifying a minimum separation of 320m from a single turbine to the nearest neighbour. Distances from clusters of two or three would be greater of course.
Regarding the other comments, the poor initial record of the Proven has been widely commented on, but they have the installed base and reference sites etc.
--
aesmith
![]() |
Tony Smith - 24/09 |
![]() |
scott smith - 25/09 |
![]() |
Tony Smith - 26/09 |
![]() |
scott smith - 26/09 |
![]() |
Tony Smith - 27/09 |
![]() |
blo - 1/10 |
![]() |
Tony Smith - 2/10 |
![]() |
scott smith - 21/10 |
![]() |
scott smith - 7/11 |
![]() ![]() |
Peter - 11/11 |
![]() |
Peter - 11/11 |
![]() |
scott smith - 14/11 |
![]() |
Tony Smith - 14/11 |
![]() |
Jonathan Hirst - 1/12 |
![]() |
Tony Smith - 12/11 |
![]() |
Peter Griffiths - 24/11 |
![]() |
Peter - 29/11 |
![]() |
Peter - 29/11 |
![]() |
Cris Gavin - 14/12 |