Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
by Tony Smith
at 2010-09-26 10:12:06
(Forum::Public::Wind)
I spoke to Environmental Health at length on Friday. The issue is this "Noise Label" that Proven have now published in their Accoustic Performance document.
Based on those figures Environmental Health are specifying a minimum separation of 320m from a single turbine to the nearest neighbour. Distances from clusters of two or three would be greater of course.
Regarding the other comments, the poor initial record of the Proven has been widely commented on, but they have the installed base and reference sites etc.
--
aesmith
Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 24/09 |
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 25/09 |
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 26/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 26/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 27/09 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
blo - 1/10 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 2/10 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 21/10 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 7/11 |
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 11/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 11/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
scott smith - 14/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 14/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Jonathan Hirst - 1/12 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Tony Smith - 12/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter Griffiths - 24/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 29/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Peter - 29/11 |
|
Re: Alternatives to Proven 15
|
Cris Gavin - 14/12 |
If you'd like to post comments on this site, just 